Bremervörde Collection Entry Questions:
Its a bird...
Its a plane...
Its an H/L3.9, S2 Breccia!
A polished partial slice of the Bremervörde arrived to me as an H3 chondrite. An appealing class on its own, but I was especially pleased when I read in Meteorites A-Z that Bremervörde was actually an H/L3.9! A quick scan of the class listings quickly revealed that Bremervörde was not only the exclusive member of the H/L3 class, but also the oldest of the H/L transitional chondrites thus making it the very first one.
|This slice of Bremervörde shows the obvious chondrule structure of a type 3 chondrite, but is it an H, an L ... or both?|
But, alas, there was decent in the ranks. The hardcopy of the Catalogue of Meteorites lists Bremervörde as a brecciated H3.7, and an internet search uncovered a few other differing numbers that ranged from a plain H3, to an H/L3.4 regolith breccia (see links 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 ). All seemed to agree that Bremervörde was both an H chondrite and of type 3, but some sources listed Bremervörde as a regolith breccia, others as just a breccia, and most with no indication as a breccia at all.
But what specifically should I enter in my catalogue?
I am certainly not the first to notice this descrepancy. In fact, the famous meteoriticist Brian Mason struggled with Bremervörde in a January 30, 1967 American Museum Novitates publication when he noted that Bremervörde had been previously classified as both an H class and an L class. Mason obtained another piece of Bremervörde, this one from the Mineralogical Institute of the University of Göttingen (the home of the main mass of Bremervörde) and his analysis lead to the conclusion that Bremervörde is an olivine-bronzite according to Prior's classification scheme (1920), and an H chondrite according to Urey-Craig (1953) classification.
|The above and below close up pictures of the polished surface of Bremervörde, while rich in chondrules, fails to show much metal common to most H chondrites.|
A caveat to
this confusion is how Dr. Mason reconciled the difference in
classifications of Bremervörde. Mason wrote, "The piece in the American
Museum of Natural History being evidently a mislabeled specimen." Could
the AMNH's piece of Bremervörde still be mislabeled? I emailed the
current AMNH meteorite collection curator to ask, but have yet to hear
back from him.
|The reverse side of the slice of Bremervörde also presents a rich chondrule texture, but other features in Bremervörde including the diagonal dark (shocked?) area extending from the lower right corner of the slice offer clues that the geologic history of Bremervörde many not be straightforward.|
A request from Accretion Desk readers: